1939vs2025

History repeats itself, it just changes the labels

Learn More

1933 to 1939 Germany

The events of 1933 in Germany had a direct and profound impact on the development of the country by 1939. The rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in 1933 marked the beginning of a totalitarian regime that would dramatically transform Germany’s political, social, and economic landscape. Here’s how the events of 1933 shaped 1939 Germany:

1. Consolidation of Power

  • 1933 Events: In January 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. This marked the beginning of the Nazi Party’s ascent to full control over the German government. In the months that followed, the Nazis used the Reichstag Fire (February 1933) as a pretext to push through the Reichstag Fire Decree, which suspended civil liberties and allowed the arrest of political opponents. The Enabling Act (March 1933) gave Hitler dictatorial powers, allowing him to bypass the Reichstag (parliament) and rule by decree.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Hitler had solidified his absolute control over Germany. The Weimar Republic was completely dismantled, and the Third Reich had fully taken shape. The political opposition, including socialists, communists, and other parties, had been either eliminated or neutralized. The Gestapo (secret police) and other surveillance mechanisms ensured that dissent was crushed, and any potential threats to Nazi rule were swiftly dealt with. Germany had effectively become a one-party state under Nazi dictatorship.

2. Totalitarian State and Suppression of Dissent

  • 1933 Events: In 1933, the Nazis began establishing the groundwork for a totalitarian state. They moved to control all aspects of German society, including education, culture, and the economy. The Nazis implemented a policy of Gleichschaltung (coordination), which brought every institution under Nazi control, from local governments to trade unions. They also targeted intellectuals, trade unions, and religious groups that could potentially oppose them.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Nazi control over every facet of German life was near-total. The SS (Schutzstaffel) and SA (Sturmabteilung), along with the Gestapo, were the primary tools of political repression, ensuring the suppression of any form of opposition. Cultural institutions, including the arts and media, were tightly regulated to promote Nazi ideology. The Nuremberg Laws (1935), which institutionalized racial discrimination, had already begun targeting Jews and other minorities, and the regime’s policies of persecution were more entrenched by 1939.

3. Economic Transformation and Autarky

  • 1933 Events: In 1933, Germany was still suffering from the effects of the Great Depression, with high unemployment and economic instability. The Nazi regime implemented a series of economic policies aimed at revitalizing the economy, including public works programs (e.g., the construction of the Autobahn), and heavy state involvement in the economy. The Nazis also pursued a policy of autarky (economic self-sufficiency), which sought to reduce Germany’s reliance on foreign imports.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, the Nazi economic policies had significantly reduced unemployment and revived industrial production. Rearmament was a key aspect of the economic strategy, and the Nazi regime invested heavily in military production, which contributed to the strengthening of the German military. The economy had recovered to a large extent, but it was increasingly geared toward supporting Nazi militarism and preparing for war. However, economic control was not entirely free from tension, as the need for war material and the push for territorial expansion led to an increasingly militarized economy.

4. Racial Policies and Anti-Semitism

  • 1933 Events: The Nazis implemented anti-Semitic policies almost immediately after taking power. In 1933, the regime began a campaign of boycotts against Jewish businesses and implemented laws that restricted the rights of Jews and other minority groups. The Nuremberg Laws (1935) institutionalized racial discrimination, specifically targeting Jews and stripping them of citizenship rights.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Nazi anti-Semitic policies had escalated into more extreme forms of persecution. Kristallnacht (the Night of Broken Glass) in 1938 marked a violent pogrom against Jews, during which synagogues, Jewish-owned businesses, and homes were destroyed. The state-sponsored campaign of anti-Semitism intensified, culminating in the eventual Final Solution — the systematic attempt to exterminate the Jewish population — which would begin in earnest during the war.

5. Military Expansion and Aggression

  • 1933 Events: After coming to power in 1933, Hitler began secretly rebuilding Germany’s military, violating the terms of the Treaty of Versailles (1919), which had imposed severe military restrictions on Germany after World War I. In 1935, Hitler introduced conscription and began expanding the military in defiance of the treaty.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Germany had rearmed and expanded its military significantly, which contributed directly to the outbreak of World War II. Hitler’s territorial ambitions — exemplified by the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1938) and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939) with the Soviet Union — had set the stage for the conflict. Germany’s military buildup and aggressive foreign policy were key elements in the lead-up to the war. The Nazi regime had also begun to implement lebensraum (living space) policies, aiming to expand German territory at the expense of neighboring countries.

6. Foreign Policy Shifts and Aggression

  • 1933 Events: In 1933, Germany’s foreign policy was shaped by its desire to revise the post-World War I order. Hitler’s aggressive rhetoric and policies aimed at undoing the Treaty of Versailles and asserting German dominance in Europe. The Nazi regime pursued rearmament and started testing the boundaries of international tolerance.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Germany’s foreign policy had become overtly aggressive. Hitler had annexed Austria (the Anschluss) in 1938 and taken control of Czechoslovakia‘s Sudetenland. The signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with the Soviet Union in August 1939 set the stage for the invasion of Poland in September 1939, which marked the official beginning of World War II. Germany’s foreign policy was now dominated by expansionism, territorial conquest, and the establishment of a Nazi-dominated European order.

7. Propaganda and the Cult of Personality

  • 1933 Events: In 1933, the Nazis began to use propaganda to manipulate public opinion and promote their ideology. Joseph Goebbels, as the Minister of Propaganda, played a critical role in shaping the narrative around Hitler and the Nazi regime, glorifying their achievements and justifying their policies.
  • Impact by 1939: By 1939, Nazi propaganda had firmly entrenched Hitler’s image as the savior of Germany, and the cult of personality around him was in full swing. The regime utilized all forms of media, including newspapers, films, and radio broadcasts, to maintain control over public perception and to demonize perceived enemies of the state, such as Jews, communists, and political dissidents.

Conclusion:

The events of 1933 were the catalyst for the transformation of Germany from a democratic Weimar Republic to a totalitarian Nazi state. By 1939, the Nazi regime had consolidated its power, implemented aggressive economic and military policies, expanded its territory, and begun its brutal persecution of minorities. These events set the stage for the outbreak of World War II, which would have catastrophic consequences for Germany and the world. The impact of 1933 was both immediate and profound, shaping the trajectory of Germany in 1939 and for years to come.

2017 to 2025 United States

The events of 2017 had a long-term impact on the United States’ response to COVID-19 in 2020 and beyond, influencing how the nation dealt with the pandemic by 2025. While the pandemic itself did not emerge until 2019-2020, several factors rooted in 2017 contributed to the challenges and decisions made during the pandemic years. Here are the key aspects:

1. Political Polarization and Trust in Institutions

  • 2017 Event: The political climate in 2017, especially with the rise of Donald Trump’s presidency, contributed to a deepening of political polarization. Trump’s leadership style, characterized by frequent misinformation, defiance of expert opinions, and a disregard for traditional political norms, set the stage for heightened divisions in the U.S. public.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): By the time the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, this polarization significantly influenced how Americans responded to the pandemic. Trust in public health institutions, such as the CDC and WHO, became severely divided along partisan lines. Mask mandates, vaccination efforts, and social distancing guidelines became contentious, with many people rejecting or politicizing health measures. By 2025, this polarization remained a key challenge in public health campaigns, affecting vaccination rates and the overall public health response.

2. Misinformation and Social Media

  • 2017 Event: The growing influence of social media and the spread of misinformation were key issues starting in 2017, particularly around political events and elections. Platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube were increasingly used to amplify partisan rhetoric and misinformation.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): Misinformation about COVID-19, its severity, and the safety of vaccines flourished on social media during the pandemic. By 2025, the legacy of misinformation remained a critical challenge, as anti-vaccine movements and conspiracy theories about the virus continued to hinder public health efforts. This prolonged the pandemic’s effects and made it harder to achieve widespread public health compliance and herd immunity.

3. Deregulation and Healthcare System Strain

  • 2017 Event: The Trump administration’s focus on deregulation in 2017, including efforts to roll back Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions, had a long-lasting impact on the healthcare system. Efforts to repeal the ACA or weaken its protections resulted in increased uncertainty about health insurance coverage and access to care for millions of Americans.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated the gaps in the U.S. healthcare system, particularly for low-income and minority populations. The lack of universal healthcare or a more comprehensive safety net led to disparities in testing, treatment access, and vaccination distribution. The failure to secure universal healthcare protections prior to the pandemic had long-term consequences on the nation’s ability to respond effectively to a public health crisis, and by 2025, efforts to reform healthcare remained a central debate.

4. Globalization and Economic Impact

  • 2017 Event: In 2017, the U.S. adopted a more nationalist economic stance under the America First policy, withdrawing from multilateral trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and focusing on tariffs and protectionism.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): The pandemic highlighted the interconnectedness of global economies and healthcare systems. Despite the previous push for economic isolationism, the U.S. economy, like others, was deeply impacted by global supply chain disruptions, including shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) and medical supplies. Additionally, the financial and economic measures to address the pandemic, such as stimulus bills, were influenced by the legacy of economic policy decisions made in 2017 and beyond.

5. Racial and Social Inequities

  • 2017 Event: The rise of white nationalism and racial tensions in 2017, notably around the Charlottesville rally and President Trump’s response to racial issues, exposed deep-seated racial inequalities within American society.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): COVID-19 disproportionately affected Black and Hispanic communities, exacerbating the inequalities that were already prevalent in healthcare, economic opportunities, and living conditions. The pandemic brought attention to these racial and socio-economic disparities, which were compounded by the Trump administration’s inadequate response to issues of racial justice and healthcare equity. By 2025, racial inequalities in healthcare and the recovery from the pandemic remained prominent issues, as did the struggle for racial justice and equity in U.S. society.

6. Emergency Management and Response Infrastructure

  • 2017 Event: In 2017, the Trump administration reduced the capacity of various agencies that might have helped manage a large-scale health crisis, including a Pandemic Response Team that had been set up during the Obama administration.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): The lack of preparedness and the cutting of key pandemic response infrastructure contributed to a slow and chaotic initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2025, efforts were underway to build more resilient systems, but the damage done in 2017 and beyond, in terms of weakening government agencies and the erosion of trust in federal institutions, had lasting consequences. Rebuilding emergency management capabilities and preparedness became a focal point for future administrations.

7. Immigration and Border Policies

  • 2017 Event: In 2017, the Trump administration took a hardline stance on immigration, enacting measures such as the Muslim travel ban and ramping up border security policies, which created friction with immigrant communities.
  • Impact on COVID-19 (2020-2025): As the pandemic spread, immigrant and undocumented populations were often excluded from relief efforts like stimulus payments and healthcare assistance. The pandemic underscored the vulnerability of immigrant communities, many of whom work in essential jobs with limited access to health protections. By 2025, debates about immigration reform, DACA, and equitable treatment for immigrants continued to be central to the political discourse, especially in light of the pandemic’s disproportionate impact on these groups.

Conclusion:

The events of 2017 significantly shaped the United States’ response to COVID-19 by 2025. From the political polarization and misinformation campaigns that hindered public health efforts to the weakening of healthcare systems and emergency preparedness, the lasting impacts of decisions and developments from 2017 played a central role in how the U.S. navigated the pandemic. The legacy of those years continued to influence national conversations about healthcare, equity, political trust, and preparedness for future crises.